Panagiotis (Panajotis) Kondylis (Παναγιώτης Κονδύλης) - Marx and Greek antiquity

Actions of governments are merely reflections of the mindset of the constituents of those countries. All humans are the same at the core of their being. All are aggressive, acquisitive animals who delight in wearing masks of “humanity” while exercising whatever power is available to them. As a race, we are doomed because as we “progress”, we become increasingly schizophrenic. If the Yemenis had the power, they would most certainly be pounding the Saudis into the dust of the desert.

We are all doomed, for we have become unable to face the hard truth about ourselves. We refuse to engage in self examination, so we are self-condemned.

@Thk

The two party system is the tool that does not allow a nation to ever have a leader that will look after his people. Democracy, as it is used here, is a construct that leads to oblivion. He designed that.

[[This comment included a picture of a ????b R????????d and the claim that his Family is worth 500 trillion and that they own nearly every central bank in the world and that they financed both sides of every war since Napoleon and that they own our news, the media, our oil and our government and that we have probably never heard of him - as well as a R???????d Bunker in case of Big War going off in Syria.]]

For most, certainly in the UK, it isn’t so much to do with being called “racist”. … It’s actually simply the certainty of arrest, public crucifixion by Jew-owned press and media, loss of job and livelihood, and the certainty of trial and imprisonment for “hate crime” – together with family and life ruin.

All Unz seems to have achieved with his review is to gather together a bunch of people with Jews on the brain.

What is this “Jew-owned press and media” you are talking of in Britain. The Guardian? Yes they did receive an infusion of money from a Jewish source some years ago, but the paper is owned by the Scott Trust, which is headed by a Scotchman.

Or did you mean the Economist? Yes there is a minor Rothschild shareholding in the company, but the biggest shareholder (44%) is the Agnelli family, so no Jewish control there. As for the rest of the media, do tell us where the Jews lurk to do their dirty work?

As for the distinction you make between being called a racist and being punished for being a racist, it seems entirely trivial to me. The fact is many people, and I would say for example, most middle-class Brits, Americans and Germans, fear being identified as a racist and to avoid it would rather see their nation die.

As for who is responsible for the destruction of the European nations, it is clearly the globalists, Jews and not Jews, as I have explained on another thread for the benefit of another crackpot anti-Semite.

The point is, there are plenty of self-serving Jewish sons of bitches, that’s for sure. But they don’t actually rule every country in the world, or indeed probably any country other than Israel. But like every other coherent racial, religious and politically motivated group they pursue their own interests. Some of them are globalists, especially those who are bankers and managers of global corporations, but many, like the Jewish members of Donald Trump’s immediate family, are America-first nationalists. So do try to get a grip on reality. The Jew obsession is a road to, if not insanity, then certainly inanity.

Kevin Macdonald’s The Culture of Critique proves that for over 100 years Jewish Americans have opposed proposed laws to give immigration preference to Europeans.

He says that Jews want a non-homogeneous society so that no other groups, particularly White Christians, can have the power to gang up on Jews.

This, combined with the Jewish lobby’s influence on our foreign policy and getting us in more and more wars, must be talked about openly in the mainstream media but unfortunately far too many white Christians are afraid of losing their jobs.

The current anti-Christian, pro-LGBT atmosphere among liberals can largely be laid at the feet of Jews too.

I am not anti-Jewish but this must all be talked about. Thank you to UNZ for doing so.

Thank you sir.

You ask a good question about cunning.

There is definitely a component of manipulation and quite honestly, overt racist hatred towards the goyim. These are the forces that have driven far too many Jews to do things that have harmed European derived civilizations and their people.

One cannot force people to like you, but this overt hatred of the goyim by far too many Jews is extremely dangerous behavior for the rest of us primarily because the Jews are so powerful and influential.

Their almost total control of the media has been a disaster for our society.

But cunning suggests a formidable intelligence and I do not really see evidence for much thought going into what they have done and what they are doing. This is particularly true with what I regard as their most glaring failure and that is the imposition of open borders on the United States and many European nations through control of the narrative and the media. Sure, far too many braindead white liberals have gone along with the plan too, but the Jews were the architects of the plan.

There is nothing intelligent in fouling one’s own nest. Ruining something that did not have to be ruined. The US was a decent nation, it did not need to be turned into a Tower of Babel with warring tribes of people with very different interests and values. The Jews could have been happy here and could have prospered. Now their own security and prosperity is at risk given the state of the nation today. This is also true in many European nations. Look at what has happened to the Jewish population in France as they now have to fear the large Muslim population there. We are all paying for THEIR folly.

That is not cunning. It is stupidity of the highest order. One can even call it madness.

Shame on us for allowing it to happen.

You make an excellent point. People are heavily influenced by what they perceive to be prevailing norms and expectations. Our media glorifies and lauds young men (and now BOYS) for becoming sodomites or mutilating their bodies to pretend to be women, instead of becoming husbands and fathers.

We need to stop pretending that homosexuality is no big deal. Challenge people when they make statements supporting this perversion or bashing “homophobes” (or even more absurdly “transphobes”). This can be awkward, but it has to happen. The survival of our nation, of our people and kindred peoples, rests in part on delegitimizing sexual perversion, homosexuality, and straight out mental illness (transgenderism).

And putting normal manhood, womanhood, loyal marriage, and devoted parenthood back on a pedestal as our ideals.

We go out of our way to praise and encourage other parents — strangers included — especially parents with numerous children, and I know from people doing it for us that it feels great and it does help. It’s also good for the anti-family misfits to hear and see how normal men act and talk, and to see that we are happy and proud of our sacrifice for our wives and children.

And as always, money talks. Whenever you see a billboard or online ad depicting two “men” holding hands or anything else suggesting homosexuality, call and email the company and politely but forcefully complain. (One particularly sickening example was a bank ad, Bank of America, on bus stops here in LA, showing a man lying all cuddly on top of his “boyfriend” on the couch, with their cat nearby. Our very young children saw it all the time, which is what the scumbags want. Oir eldest daughter said, “that man is acting like a lady.”). And stop doing business with that company if you’re doing business with them. It appears that few normal people, Christian or otherwise, are doing this in the USA.

[[Marx and Lenin were well within bourgeois norms of family and basic social (and thought) structures/content - notwithstanding that the Utopian, and never realised in practice, "final solution" state of communism, or, the "Left-communists" to the Left of Lenin, implied aspects of what is now "normal" in Western mass democracies (as caricatures of the envisioned communism of most original Marxists and Marxist-Leninists) - after all, Mao and Stalin were in practice and in the main (and notwithstanding all their "eccentricities" which took place incl. for concrete power-political reasons), in favour of Nationalism/Socialism in One Country, and Socialist Families (Father, Mother, Children) and Socialist Realism = a proletarian version of mainstream bourgeois ethical norms against Hedonistic "Degeneracy". Articles and passages which are engaged in Left/Right polemics misrepresent the factual truth, properly analysed in terms of differentiae specificae. BUT if you want to call it "Cultural Marxism", call it "Cultural Marxism" - by all means (especially since absolutely ZIO-LOBOTOMISED "minds" at: 

The J??dian, The J?? Jork Times, The J??shington Jost, JN?, JO? 

?ews, The J??legraph, The 

J??nancial Jimes, etc., etc., etc., (there are many more of them "J"s in the mass media - in fact they're almost everywhere there is a mainstream = absolutely VOMIT-SICKLY-SICKENING and ULTRA-UGLY, HORRID-HORRIFIC-HORROR J-Stuff) 

equate "Far Right" with anything that does not suit the Satanic Circus Monkey's FULL-SPECTRUM ZIO-LOBOTOMISATION-SATAN-DEVIL-EVIL agenda of ISRAEL never becoming a "One World Open Society" but everyone else "MUST"). As far as P.K.'s tripartite macro-historical ideal-typical social-formation analysis is concerned (societas civilis-oligarchic bourgeois liberalism-mass democracy), Marxism is clearly a product of the oligarchic bourgeois liberal era, and Leninism/Stalinism/Maoism (up to and incl. Hồ and Che) reflects the national-liberation break-down of mainly White capitalistic Colonialism and Imperialism as a form of extreme Left early/proto-mass democracy, and as a social phenomenon is related to both Western parliamentary "rule of law" mass democracy, and to Fascism as an extreme for of Right-Wing mass democracy in that they all (all three - in their different ways, different degrees and in their differing time-frames etc.) further massified, atomised, industrialised, urbanised, secularised-sensorialised-deSpiritualised, feminised etc. society and broke down (traditional) Religion and patriarchal-oikos-extended-family Tradition in general. Hedonistic life-stances en masse in practice, though, are the product of White and grossly disproportionately ZIO/USA Western consumeristic mass democracy, and unless we are now living in Marxist times, then there is no such thing - objectively seen - as "cultural Marxism" (in other words the social-cultural basis as to economy, politics and social-cultural relations arose c. WW1/ WW2 and the 1960s and 1970s cultural revolution, with GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATE ZIO-INPUT, but within the Western mass-democratic social formation of high mass productivity, high mass consumption and a very refined division of labour/very high mobility etc. - and it is a social framework within which hedonistic consumerism and atomistic narcissism can and do flourish). Marxism was about Socialism and Communism and an end to all capitalistic relations (and not the mere variation of capitalism which is mass democracy with its social-democratic increased state-interventionist-regulatory elements), with people being liberated to the point where they would become something like creative bourgeois Little Goethes and bourgeois Little Beethovens et al., and not drug-fucked, tattooed, multi-pierced, STD-ridden, pill-popping, party-goers and FULL-SPECTRUM OTHERISED/OTHER-WORSHIPING ZIO-LOBOTOMISED FREAK-APE-ZOMBIES. Marx was fully within Western culture and the Western History of Ideas (increasingly gathering steam from the 16th century) re: the classical ideal, (a tendency towards) materialism, anti-(traditional-)metaphysics, atheism, pro-Reason in the sense of the Enlightenment mainstream = anti-Religion/anti-Christian stances, (a version of) the notion of Progress and of Mankind etc. (see P.K.'s main histories of philosophy and the short books I'm translating now on Marx when available above, + other texts...) (+ Where does Engels's The Origin of the Family,... call for a situation like the one we find in the West today? (+ I've written about Gramsci elsewhere on this page, and Lukás concentrated mostly on: 

reification/commodification, dialectics, and being a smart-arse - 

he definitely didn't go down the Western mass-democratic "degenerate"-Hedonistic Frankfurt School-type Path... - and just because ZIO-Adorno wrote about dialectics incl. in relation to his fellow Tribal Warrior ZIO-Hungarian and in his more often than not nonsensical ZIO-SUPER-SMART-ARSE "look at me, aren't I ZIO-intelligent" manner, it's neither Here nor There nor Synthesised, as far as what we are talking about HERE is concerned...)). It was the Industrial Revolution and Capitalism-Imperialism which set up the conditions for the Death of the West, so in a way, "we all got what we deserved." The ZIO-Satanists just grabbed the opportunities handed to them incl. via Frankfurt School-style Academia after Germany's twin World War defeats and the USA's clear Western supremacy-Hegemony. But like I continue to say, write whatever you want to write, and believe whatever you want to believe. It really will probably make no practical difference, because the West is essentially already DONE and FINISHED - it's just that it'll take a bit more time for more people to realise (The end of The Cold War signaled the end of the substantive Left/Right divide since the French Revolution (which c. 1848 included real societas civilis conservatives, liberal capitalists and social democrats/socialists/ communists, and then went on c. 1870-1900 to become only capitalists vs. socialists and by about WW2/Burnham etc. it was Western mass democracy vs. Sovietism/Communism, until Sovietism/Communism mostly died, and what remained is both 

Republican/Conservative "Right" and Democrat/Labour "Left" 

pretty much supporting the same things (e.g. re: basic structure of the highly regulated economy, FULL-SPECTRUM "One World" "multi-cultural" ZIO-LOBOTOMISATION in circumstances of Hedonistic Consumerism, more or less relatively Open Borders and or mass legal migration, Poofter-Marriage and Femino-Faggot Retardism, etc., etc., etc.), and so what we are now really in is the Beginning of an Era of Group-Nation and or Supra/Multi-National State Survival in regard to Resources without any substantive Left/Right differences of capitalism vs. socialism - you just think that those differences exist - yet they don't, because as this century progresses it'll all boil down to access to energy, water, basic resources, food, security, etc. - and these are all elemental survival issues. So we have already entered the age of elemental survival under the threat of increasing APE-ANOMIE and a Left/Right (as in the old bourgeois-based Left/Right socialist-capitalist) divide cannot and will not again substantively emerge when conditions put an end to Hedonistic Consumerism, and require a need for more Ascetic Life Stances under Pain of Scarcity and Heightened APE-Anomie). In any event, May I be wrong. If we were to all be alive in the year 2100 and I was wrong, then I'd be the first to say that I am wrong. Amen. [[And to be fair to everyone, incl. to P.K., without all of his books/articles translated into English in easier-to-read versions than my own, I'm just basically "talking to myself" - and I'm certainly not having a go at anyone, personally. You are all (if you exist) more than welcome from my point of view to continue referring to "Cultural Marxism" and "Liberal Democracy" and new and old political Left/Right divides, and whatever else takes your fancy ("Human Rights" etc.), and whatever you think or know will "Marshal the Troops" and prepare you for your ideological and or other Battles (as a kind of sort of post-Cold War continuation of the Cold War). P.K.'s "classifications" are certainly not for articles with polemical intent, and require many years of mastering from the original German - and that's the way Science "has to be", and all of you, quite understandably, are not so much concerned with Science as with trying to Save whatever you can of the West. And as a Westerner myself (the West - very broadly defined, mind you! -), I can fully understand all of that).]] [[+ I also remind any readers of Marx being against immigration as lowering local wages (as in scab labour, strikebreaking, etc., i.e. workers should stay put in their country of origin, and return back to such country if they have been imported to another country as "cheap labour") - notwithstanding the ideology of proletarian internationalism - ... + Marx being pro-nationalism or anti-nationalism in accordance with his view of what suited the further development of capitalism, and then socialism, in regard to the specific case in question, e.g. initially in favour of Greek independence, but later against it, in his anti-Russian pro-English zeal, given he viewed Russia as "holding back" capitalistic Progress etc.. This is all fascinating stuff, with a number of points of "contradictoriness" depending on the era Marx was writing in his own intellectual development, and also dependent on the concrete situation before him.]]

"Cultural Marxism is a combination of Gramsci and György Lukás’s ideas on culture, critical theory of the Frankfurt School, a smattering of Stalinism and Maoism, plus the identity politics and metapolitics of the contemporary Left. That some of these beliefs diverge from classical Marxism is nothing new. Neo Marxism began shortly after Marx’s death and was well established with Leninism. What we see here is a continuing evolution of strategies to subvert Western culture, creating an elaborate justification to attack and undermine Whites, especially White men, and the civilization they created." (https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2018/11/20/method-in-their-madness-review-of-michael-rectenwalds-springtime-for-snowflakes/?temp-new-window-replacement=true)

[[Another way of looking at things is to consider that (most of) the better writers e.g. at The National Interest (starting with Mearsheimer) concentrate on international relations and tend to "turn a blind eye" to what can be done internally to the USA polity (as far as I am aware - I could be wrong), because at the end of the day, if the USA and its allies are not secure on the world stage incl. as to energy, trade, etc., there is not going to be absolutely anything to fight over domestically re: the USA... and those in command of the ZIO-USA State are going to do everything possible to avoid State Break-up e.g. into racial sub-states, because the real Power lies in the USA being united (Lincoln), so my personal view is that there is no real (but the tiniest) chance of "white nationalism" ever holding sway (most people have either mixed it up themselves, are Others, or approve of mixing anyway), and what it'll all boil down to is more of a "Law and Order" vs. APE-ANOMIE situation/dichotomy, something like in Brazil with obviously the different ZIO-USA characteristics...]] {{In the case of the "neoconservatives" who found inspiration in Trotsky, we are not dealing with Trotskyists/Trotskyites in the sense of the Marxist-Leninist side of Trotsky (which obviously existed), but with Jews (Zionists, ZIO-SUPRECMACISTS of the FULL-SPECTRUM ZIO-LOBOTOMY) (and then later, their Protestant-et al. "ZIO-cock-sucking comrades") who took the Utopian notion inherent in both Liberalism (properly understood) and Communism, as well as in Trotsky (and ZIO-Parvus, of "Permanent Revolution"), incl. with regard to Trotsky's more extreme "left-communistic" tendencies (noted by Lenin), as opposed to the nationalistic Realpolitik of both Lenin, and much more in practice because Lenin died in 1924, of Stalin, succeeding Lenin (refer to Theory of War - Summary Notes in regard to Lenin, when available), who notwithstanding the Sloganeering of "Proletarian Internationalism", in effect represented (as an Orthodox Georgian) a form of Russian Nationalism-Imperialism incl. using the weapon of De-Colonisation and National Liberation and also incl. post-Stalin up to approx. Hồ and Che (with the "totally Psycho" version of all of that in the form of Pol Pot). So, by de-coupling, in ZIO fashion, Trotsky from the very strong Old Left communistic aspects of his thought, the "ZIO-Supremacist-NeoConJobbers" (who by the way, seek to conserve absolutely nothing from the real and historical Societas Civilis/Feudalism - so they in the American political system represent just another GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATE ZIO-Takeover of Political Space within both The Political and politics, with the other main side being the ZIO-DEM-TARDS, and with both representing mass-democratic practice and ideology,...), ZIO-Weaponised that absolutely Repellent Rodent-Rat-Jew, Trotsky, (subjectively seen as a matter of Taste), who considered himself a Russian (yeah-sure, "good one"), and basically pushed the mass-democratic ZIO-USA agenda of "One World" Femino-Faggotistic FULL-SPECTRUM ZIO-LOBOTOMY, where the absolutely ludicrous notion is purported that the whole world should tend towards Feminised and Faggotised MENTAL ILLNESS (FULL-SPECTRUM ZIO-LOBOTOMISATION) (subjectively seen as a matter of Taste) - and even more ridiculously (and absolutely ZIO-PREPOSTEROUSLY) - that somehow the whole world Revolves around Jews (who = the absolute depths in FILTH - subjectively seen as a matter of Taste) and their "Holocaust" as well as the "de-construction" of Patriarchal Christian Families (= ZIO-Wrecking the West TOTALLY even though the West got to where it got without the Jews being One of the main HISTORICAL CAUSES... (as explained elsewhere many times throughout this Site)) - and as if more than 200 million non-ZIO-JEWFILTH (subjectively seen as a matter of Taste) Innocents were not massacred or otherwise died unfairly in the 20th century, and as if Jews and Israel should not enjoy in Israel SIX (6) million "new Israelis" coming from Black Africa and Brownish-Black Mohammedanism,... let alone the GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATE accumulations of forms of Power (and Wealth) which "just happen", - and not because of very aggressive and highly successful PRIMITIVE SECRET SOCIETY NETWORKING -, which goes back centuries, and ultimately ties into banking/finance and International Trade, etc., etc., etc.. So, now it's up to - macro-historically seen - THE MEN (Han Men, Hindu Men, Ape Men, ??? Men) to deal with them (over the next 100... or... 1000 years, as the case may be), because formerly Christian-Western-White Men are basically as good as DEAD already (and none of that means that things will "get better" - on the contrary, things are probably going to get much, much, much WORSE!!!)}}

Keep in mind that private heresies are irrelevant; nobody cares about private options provided the PC gods are honored in public.

Yep, it’s a ‘religious’ war. It’s about ‘gods’ and heresies.

It all depends on what we mean by ‘lie’.

If a rational person says he believes in evolution based on facts, he is speaking scientific truth. But, if he then says that he, as a good Catholic, believes in God, in the Divinity of Jesus, and miracles, would he be lying? After all, there are no facts that support the existence of God or Jesus as the Son of God or miracles.
Also, we may ask how a rational person who accepts modern science could also believe in God and religion that have no basis in factual evidence. And yet, we are okay with such a person because we tend to separate Reason and Faith. We tolerate and even honor people who are, at once, rational & scientific AND religious & faith-oriented. It’s as if we feel that leading a fact-based life isn’t enough; people need some kind of ‘spiritual’ meaning or purpose in life.

Now, such consideration may not seem to matter in the academia that is supposed to be about reason, logic, science, and study of truth. And yet, every society is ‘spiritual’ about something. It holds certain narratives, icons, and dogma as sacrosanct. Marxism and Leninism were holy in the Soviet Union despite its official commitment to Scientific Materialism. Marx was god, Lenin was a moses-figure. So, a university head in the USSR would have gotten in hot water if he questioned the wisdom of Marx and Lenin.
Then, the same applies in the West. While all these academics claim to be rational, factual, and logical, the fact is they are ideological and ‘idological’. They cling to certain Narratives and Dogmas as all-explaining, near-divine or prophetic. And most likely, they grew up worshiping certain icons and idols as sacred and holy-shmoly. In the presence of certain ideas or images, they’ve been trained to talk in hushed reverent tones.

So, what are some of the sacro-idols & ideologies of the West? Much of it has to do with certain favored groups. Blacks are deemed a holy race. Much of it has to do with ‘white guilt’ and ‘white fever’. Historical guilt over slavery and racial discrimination. But also white ‘fever’ for Negroes as superior sportsmen, singers, and studs & biatches. So, blacks are prized as both the American moses and the Golden Calf. White attitude toward blacks is both of reverence and revelry. “I worship MLK as saint-matyr… and I wish he would hump my wife.” But there is also the element of fear. Because blacks are vocal, loud, aggressive, and demanding, white folks wet their pants in fear of black rage. So, they figure the best way to calm blacks down is to appease them at every turn.

But there is another reason for White Guilt & Fever. Jewish Supremacist Power. Jews are rich and powerful but only 2% of the US population. As such, Jewish Supremacist Power relies on white support. But it is not natural for white goyim to favor Jewish interests over white interests. It is not natural for whites to favor Jewish identity over white identity. But without the support of whites, Jewish Power is like a head without a body. After all, even as Neocons cooked up Wars for Israel, it required white tax payers, white generals, white managers, white bureaucrats, white soldiers, and etc to carry them out.
It’s like British Power was both awesome and fragile in India. Brits had modern guns and could mow down lots of people. So, they could strike fear into the Hindus. BUT, without the collaboration of the native brown masses, what could a few 100,000 Brits do in India for the long haul? So, the Brits did everything possible to suppress Indian nationalism and persuade the natives that the true glory of India depended on it being the Jewel in the British Crown. To serve British Glory was the duty of good Indians. At some point, Indians said ‘bullshi*’ and demanded their own identity and interests. And then, the Brits were finished in India.

Jews feel the same way in the US. It was never natural for white goyim and/or Christians to serve Jews who are only 2% of the population. It was even more unnatural for whites to favor Jews over themselves. And now, it is totally unnatural for whites to praise and honor Jews who are the main force behind anti-white vitriol in the US. Jews in NYT are now calling for the polyglotization of the US to replace whites with. Jews look upon whites like Zionists looked upon Palestinians. A people to replace. In Palestine, Jews alone could do it. But in the West, Jews need the globo-numbers of Diversity to replace whites. Of course, Jews don’t intend to get rid of whites entirely. Indeed, if all whites were to vanish and if the West were made up only of Jews and non-whites, Jews would be in serious trouble as they can’t guilt-bait non-whites(who also happen to be less competent and more dependent). Jews want Diversity to the extent that future whites won’t be able to form a solid majority bloc and use populist democracy to challenge and overthrow Jewish Power. Hungarians could choose nationalism and drive out Soros-ism because they are the solid majority. But it’s increasingly difficult for the White Party to win elections in the US. Jews figure that Diversity will undermine white electoral power. And PC divides whites into two camps, with both camps sucking up to Jews. In the US, the ‘right’ vs ‘left’ among whites amount to progs calling conzos ‘nazis’ AND conzos calling progs ‘anti-semites’ because, supposedly, the Democrats are only 100% than 200% for Israel(like GOP cucks are). Jews must be laughing at the white tards. Anyway, as whites lose out to Diversity, Jews figure that one bunch of whites will embrace Diversity as their salvation(from past ‘racism’) and another bunch of whites(the nationalists) will lose heart and just surrender since their power is lost forever. (Look at the state of conservatives in California. They are like the Palestinian minority in Israel. They figure, “if you can’t beat em, join em.” They got the Stockholm Syndrome.)

Still, the Jewish strategy is paradoxical. Jews are weakening white power because they rely on white power. If Jewish supremacism relies on white power, it would seem that Jews would want white power to be stronger. After all, it would be stupid for a rider to weaken his horse. Naturally, he wants a fast and strong horse. And yet, he has to destroy the will of the horse. He has to weaken the horse’s independent spirit because if the horse is not broken-in-spirit and has horse-pride, it would run off by itself than being a servant-animal to a human rider. Likewise, on the one hand, Jews prize white power like a rider prizes a powerful horse. But Jews fear white pride + white power. Jews want white power without the pride. That way, white power can be manipulated into serving something other than whiteness. White Power + White Guilt means whites will feel a need to redeem themselves. Since whiteness = guilt, whites can only find redemption by serving another people(deemed morally superior to whites). And this is why Jews have pushed the Shoah Cult. Whites have been made to feel like they committed the worst crime of all time against the finest people on Earth, the Jews. But while Jews are accomplished in wit, intellect, and comedy, they don’t excite whites in other areas. In contrast, Negroes have loud voices, athleticism, and bouncy booties & bigger dongs, the kind of stuff that can be packaged as entertainment for white folks seeking instant thrills. Also, blacks are the ONLY people who can weaken white male pride. While Jews can bait White Guilt, Jewish guys cannot rob white men of manhood. If the US had no blacks, whites would dominate idols of manhood. But blacks are more muscular and aggressive. And they got bigger dongs. And so, white manhood has been crushed. And that means jungle fever among white women. So, whites are paralyzed not only by white guilt but white cucky-wuckery. Since white males lose their manhood to blacks in sports, song, and sex, they try to regain it by joining the military; and then Jews can use such whites to fight Wars for Israel. John McCain Syndrome. Notice how McCain was a total cucky-wuck when it came to Jews, blacks, and browns. But he was so useful to Jews as a barking dog against Iranians, Syrians, Palestinians, Russians(people hated by Jews), and white patriots. Serving as a growling dog of Jewish Power was the ONLY way McCain could regain his manhood.

But, Jewish strategy may lose out in the long run. True, Jews are smart to subvert white pride and manipulate white guilt to make white power serve Jewish supremacism. White Power minus pride and plus guilt will serve something other than whiteness. It will serve what is deemed sacred and redemptive in the West. But when white power is made to lose so much pride & confidence and go into pathetic cucky-wuck mode, might it not be useful any longer to Jewish supremacism? There are signs of this already in the British Labour Party. Whites in the Labour Party are such self-hating whites that they’ve surrendered to Mass Immigration and Diversity. And that means cucky whites sucking up to Muslims and Africans who feel no sympathy for Jews. British Jews pushed Diversity in the UK to guilt-bait whites, but now, the guilt-infected whites in the Labour Party feel more sympathy for Palestinians than for Jews. They are committed to serving Diversity at any cost, especially to the detriment of whites. But such weakened and self-loathing white power(lessness) becomes not only useless but dangerous to Jews. If indeed Diversity is the highest good, then cucky-wuck ‘good’ whites must side with ‘poor’ Muslims against rich Jews(whom are regarded as white by Diversity).

As Jewish supremacists control media and academia, the Holy Three are Jews, blacks, and homos. Diversity is a sacred dogma, but it isn’t identity-specific. After all, it is permissible in the West to badmouth Muslims and scare-monger about Yellow Peril. Also, poking fun at Mexicans isn’t a cardinal sin either though disapproved. Jews prize blacks above other non-whites because black guys are the only ones who can kick white butt and rob whites of manhood. Also, the bellowing voice of blacks(as with MLK) is more effective in filling whites with ‘guilt’. It sounds like god hisself admonishing whites for their ‘sinful’ ways. In contrast, Jews can’t rely on oratory to guilt-bait whites. Woody Allen or Adam Sandler giving a “I have a dream” speech just wouldn’t cut it. Also, Jews prize homos because both groups are heavily involved in entertainment and vanity industry that are central to the current decadent West and its culture of narcissism. Also, homo poopchutzpah has the same kind of egotism as Jewish chutzpah. Homos aren’t no longer content with tolerance. They demand to be worshiped, and Jews have promoted this side of homo-ness to finally destroy Christianity, a religion they loathe, by having it replaced with Homomania.

So, returning to why universities lie so much. They are controlled by Jewish supremacists who’ve turned Jew-worship, Afromania, and Homomania as the most sacred neo-religions of America. Religions cannot be questioned. It’s a matter of faith. It doesn’t matter if the object of faith is true or false. What matters is it’s SACRED, therefore unquestionable. Since Jews are holy, we must love Jews and never criticize Jewish Power. We must even shut down free speech as ‘hate speech’ for its blasphemy against Jewish holiness. And since blacks are the holy race of MLK-as-new-moses and Muhammad-Ali-as-new-hero, we must admire them and believe they got the midas touch. So, any problem arising from blacks must be the fault of some other group… namely white goy! And homos, oh homos, we must worship the homos and drape church after church with ‘gay’ symbols.
Matters of Faith are immune to charges of lies and mendacity. The fact is PC isn’t merely ideological or political. It is about hallowing certain ideas into mantras, certain narratives into canon, and certain idols/icons into gods & heroes.

Now, surely there are goy elites in academia who know the truth but play along. It’s often about craven careerism, but then, no one wants to regard himself as a coward. So, they rationalize that they really believe in the official lies. But then, when certain lies have been elevated as items of faith, it doesn’t matter if it is true or false. All that matters is that it is HOLY, and what is deemed holy is self-justifying and doesn’t need to be backed by facts… just like it’d be absurd to insist that a man of faith present evidence for God. Even though the academia is ostensibly secular and rational, it just so happens that human psychology, being what it is, always favors ‘faith’ over facts. After all, facts are cold and hard whereas faith is warm and fuzzy. Just as people prefer a warm soft bed over a cold hard floor, even secular and rational people are emotionally drawn to the sacral glow over the stark truth.

Also, the flipside of the warm fuzzy sacral glow is the vanity of virtue. It’s hard to feel virtuous over facts. Facts determine something as true or false, not as righteous or wicked. In contrast, faith is about feeling not only holy but holier-than-thou. And in order to feel morally supreme over others, there needs to be witches, heretics, blasphemers, and goblins. And according to PC, the greatest ‘sins’ are ‘racism’, ‘antisemitism’, and ‘homophobia’. (Sometimes ‘misogyny’ is included, but this is an off-and-on thing because Jewish-controlled music, movie, and sex industries rely so much on treating women as a bunch of whores and sluts.) In a world without God, the ONLY way that secular people can feel holier-than-thou is to throw fits about the neo-sins of ‘racism’, ‘antisemitism’, and ‘homophobia’, matters which are not to be discussed or critiqued but accepted, worshiped, and obeyed. So, even facts can be denounced as ‘racist’(blacks commit lots of crime because they are naturally stronger and more aggressive), ‘antisemitic’(Jews have the commanding power in the West due to higher IQ and tribal networking), and ‘homophobic’(the reason why AIDS spread like wildfire in the 80s was because of mass orgies of fecal penetration within the fruit community). They are facts but they run counter to the favored holy-shmoly image of blacks as eternal saints, Jews as eternal victims, and homos as perfect angels.

So, to deal with the lies of academia, we must first tackle the fact of how PC turned certain lies into matters of faith, therefore immune to facts and truth.

As for social disorder: Pat Buchanan… reminded us in a column just last month how very disorderly the USA, and the rest of the civilized world, was fifty years ago. The Weathermen and the Black Panthers; the Symbionese Liberation Army—remember them? The Red Brigades and the Baader-Meinhof gang; political assassinations; the 1968 Democratic Convention; Kent State and Cornell; … Antifa put up a good show… As a force for generalized disorder, though, they are not impressive. Antifa would run like chickens from a whiff of grapeshot.

But 50 yrs ago, despite the preponderance of violent radical groups, mainstream society was sound and stable, i.e. most people grew up with both parents, church life was strong, and there were plenty of old people who still remembered WWI and WWII and Depression, people who grew up prior to Youth Culture that lionized impulsiveness, immaturity, and easy addiction to pop fashions.

So, while radical groups were acting crazy, the Social Core of Mainstream Society was that of the Silent Majority. Solid stuff.

But today, despite there being less terrorism and the like, the Social Core has eroded and rotted. There is anarchy in every household. It’s about wives hounding their hubbies for voting for Donald Trump or not being sufficiently opposed to him. It’s about crazy spouses suing to have their kids turn into Trankenstein monsters via ‘gender transition’ surgery. Also, slut behavior is common among educated middle class women. And there are tattoos all over the place. There is open porn even for kids. Even middle class people with professions have funny-colored hair or have tattoos all over.
So, there is constant micro-anarchy everywhere and at all times. Anarcho-degeneracy has crept into every home. Even a supposedly ‘conservative’ show like new ROSANNE featured trankenstein kids. ‘Gay marriage’ became law of the land. And even though Women’s March didn’t lead to people get killed, the sight of all those women with ‘pussy hats’ makes one wonder what the hell happened to America. And then, there are these mega ‘gay pride’ marches and parades, as if there is no higher value than Anno Sodimini.

And look at colleges. In the 60s, the radical students were acting crazy whereas most professors, left or right, were bourgeois in style and respectable. So, despite radical students and agitators, the core bastion of academia was still respectable.
Today, entire departments are overrun by professors who are crazy and demented and push nutjob trivialities. Also, since they envy those with money or privilege in economic spheres(Wall Street, Hollywood, Silly Valley, Las Vegas, etc), they try to compensate with classroom control. They don’t so much teach their students as turn them into obedient barking minions. Classrooms have turned into initiation rites into pseudo-intellectual gangs.

Furthermore, feminism and slut culture have destroyed birthrates in the West. Drugs and degeneracy are leading to early death and suicide. That means white population will decline and be replaced by Third Worlders. While the globo elites can shame and control white masses with ‘white guilt’, such will become impossible when the majority of people in the West becomes non-white. And then, the West will become like Latin America that is in a perpetual state of anarcho-tyranny whether it’s ruled by ‘rightists’ in Colombia or ‘leftists’ in Venezuela.
It will be even worse in Europe as millions of black Africans pour in, beat up white males and carry out massive Afro-Colonization of White Wombs that will Africanize the European gene pool in ugabugery.