Disclaimer: Nothing within this page or on this site overall is the product of Panagiotis Kondylis's thought and work unless it is a faithful translation of something Kondylis wrote. Any conclusions drawn from something not written by Panagiotis Kondylis (in the form of an accurate translation) cannot constitute the basis for any valid judgement or appreciation of Kondylis and his work. (This disclaimer also applies, mutatis mutandis, to any other authors and thinkers linked or otherwise referred to, on and within all of this website).
EVERYBODY MUST OBEY, ABIDE BY AND FOLLOW THE LAW
ALL KILLINGS AND CAUSING OF DEATH AND INJURY TO INNOCENT
NON-COMBATANTS ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD ARE CONDEMNED
A POSTERIORI AND A PRIORI, REGARDLESS OF WHO THE VICTIMS ARE
If you read stuff written by the ABSOLUTELY CRAZED CONTINUALLY SELF-LOBOTOMISING ULTRA-LOONY MAD SATIRICAL LITERARY PERSONA (born c. 599, 699, 799, 899 or 999 A.D. in Hellenic Eastern Rome) WITHOUT HAVING READ AND STUDIED AND UNDERSTOOD ALL OF P.K.'s CORE TEXTS FIRST (AND AT THE RATE I'M CURRENTLY GOING, THAT WON'T BE POSSIBLE (UNLESS YOU KNOW GERMAN OR GREEK) BEFORE c. 2052 IF I MAKE IT THAT FAR IN AN ABLE-BODIED STATE (HIGHLY UNLIKELY, IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE)), THEN YOU ARE DOING WHAT YOU HAVE BEEN TOLD NOT TO DO, AND YOU ARE BEING RATHER NAUGHTY - TO SAY THE LEAST. I FIND, THOUGH, THAT NO-ONE EVER LISTENS TO ME, SO THEREFORE, I MUST BE WRONG. I MUST BE
NO POLITICAL-IDEOLOGICAL COURSE OF ACTION IS BEING SUPPORTED OR OTHERWISE SUGGESTED BY THIS SITE EVER (THE SITE'S SATIRICAL-LITERARY PERSONA IS LITERALLY CRAZED CRAZY LOONY MAD) UNLESS IT IS SOMETHING P.K. WROTE IN REGARD TO THE 1% OF HIS OEUVRE CONCERNING GREECE'S "FATE" AND WHETHER SHE WANTS TO SURVIVE OR NOT (OBVIOUSLY SHE DOES NOT).
THE
LITERARY-SATIRICAL PERSONA COMMENTING ON THIS PAGE AND THROUGHOUT THIS SITE IS
INSANE. NO WRITER, THINKER OR AUTHOR REFERRED TO HERE HAS ANYTHING TO DO WITH
ANY KIND OF DISCRIMINATION, BIGOTRY, RACISM OR CHAUVINISM WHATSOEVER. EVERY
THINKER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR OWN - AND ONLY FOR THEIR OWN - WORDS. THE
PERSONA COMMENTING ON THIS PAGE AND THROUGHOUT THIS SITE WAS BORN BETWEEN
599A.D. AND 999A.D. AND HAS GONE TOTALLY INSANE. DON'T PAY ATTENTION TO HIS
COMMENTS. THINK, AND WORK "IT" OUT, FOR YOURSELVES.
THE RELIEF-RELEASE VALVE IS STILL WORKING.
Βαλβίς, Entlastung.
Tool, Ἐργαλεῖον.
ΣΥΓΓΝΩΜΗ ΕΚ ΤΩΝ ΠΡΟΤΕΡΩΝ ΔΙΑ ΤΑ ΟΡΘΟΓΡΑΦΙΚΑ, «ΤΥΠΟΓΡΑΦΙΚΑ» ΤΕ ΚΑΙ ΑΛΛΑ ΛΑΘΗ. ΤΡΕΧΩ - ΣΑΝ ΤΟΝ ΒΕΓΓΟ - ΑΛΛΑ ΔΕΝ ΠΡΟΛΑΒΑΙΝΩ. Ἡ ΖΩΗ ΑΣΦΑΛΩΣ ΔΕΝ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΑΠΛΩΣ ΕἿΣ ἹΣΤΟΤΟΠΟΣ. ὙΠΑΡΧΟΥΝ ΚΑΙ ΠΡΑΓΜΑΤΙΚΟΙ, ΖΩΝΤΑΝΟΙ ΑΝΘΡΩΠΟΙ. ΣΤΟ ΚΑΤΩ ΚΑΤΩ ΤΗΣ ΓΡΑΦΗΣ, ΤΙ ΕΙΝΑΙ Ἡ ΖΩΗ ΤΟΥ ἙΚΑΣΤΟΥ ΑΝΔΡΟΣ ΧΩΡΙΣ ΤΗΝ ΚΥΡ' ΑΓΓΕΛΩ ΤΟΥ, ΑΝ ΕΧῌ ΤΗΝ ΤΥΧΗ ΝΑ ΕΧῌ ΚΙ ΑΥΤΟΣ ΜΙΑ ΚΥΡ' ΑΓΓΕΛΩ ΝΑ ΤΟΝ ΠΡΟΣΕΧῌ;
*
IF NO ENGLISH TRANSLATION IS PROVIDED WITH THE “CLASSIC QUOTES” BELOW, ANY ENGLISH-LANGUAGE-ONLY READER CAN COPY AND PASTE INTO A GOOGLE-LIKE ONLINE TRANSLATOR AND WILL GET THE GIST OF “WHAT IS GOING ON” ...
*
FROM HELMUT FLEISCHER’S INTRODUCTION
S. 12
»Die späten Parteischulmarxisten hatten sich in ihrem hauptberuflichen Engagement so sehr auf den Idealismus ihrer Widersacher eingeschossen, daß sie die Idealismen gar nicht mehr bemerkten, die sie in ihren eigenen Lehrbuchdoktrinen über die Ziele und Prinzipien ihres Sozialismus mit sich führten.«
THIS IS VERY FUCKING FUNNY, GIVEN THE 1968 SCENE ...
»Mao hat die Fragen beantwortet, die ich offen ließ.«
AAAAAAAAAAAAAA-
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
NOW THIS IS THE KEY TO FUCKING EVERYTHING IN THE “WEST” AND IN REGARD TO THE “LEFT”. GIVEN THAT “THE LEFT” OF 1968 HAD IN EFFECT GIVEN UP ON THE SOCIAL-ECONOMIC REORGANISATION OF SOCIETY ΟΝ A SOCIALISTIC-COMMUNISTIC BASIS, AND WAS CONFUSING ACTUAL MAOISM ... (WHICH HAD CONCRETE POLITICAL APPLICATION IN MAO’S CHINA FOR THE GREAT LONG MARCH LEGENDARY MAO’S AND HIS CLIQUE’S BENEFIT IN CONSOLIDATING COMMUNIST PARTY RULE AND THE EVENTUAL TRANSITION TO THE (BLACK CAT-WHITE CAT CATCH THE MICE) SUPER COMRADE DENG) ... WITH CULTURAL-POLITICAL POSTER-SLOGAN TOKENISM (SEE THE RELEVANT JEAN LUC-GODARD FILMS OF THOSE TIMES, ONE OF WHICH THE CRAZY MAN HAS REVIEWED ELSEWHERE ON THIS SITE) ... WHICH (TOKENISM WITHOUT ANY ACTUAL, REAL SOCIALISTIC REVOLUTIONARY SUBSTANCE) THE HEDONISTIC-CONSUMERIST ANGLO-ZIO-USA-SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY JOO COULD AND DID INCLUDE IN HIS FULLY MASSIFYING-ATOMISING-MAMMONISING SOCIETY OF FREAK SHOW EXCREMENT AND GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATE ZIO-JOOISH ACCUMULATIONS, CONCENTRATIONS AND CYRSTALLISATIONS OF MONEY AND BANKING-CORPORATE-FINANCIAL-MASS MEDIA-BRAIN WASHING-LOBOTOMISING-EXCREMENTAL-FEMINO-FAGGOTISING-APE-ZIO-KOST-SATAN TENT-WORSHIPPING-OTHERISING-IMPERIALISTIC-HEGEMONIC ETC. POWER ...
S. 13
»Von jener »kleinen deutschen Kulturrevolution«, die im westlichen Berlin eines ihrer Zentren hatte, sagt Peter Furth in seinem Vortrag »Verweigerte Bürgerlichkeit« im Sinne der These des Philosophen Panajotis Kondylis (1943-1998), daß ihre Akteure »Entwicklungen befördert haben, von denen sie sich Revolution erwarteten, die ihrer Wirklichkeit nach aber zur massendemokratischen Konsolidierung der industriellen Gesellschaft gehören«.4 = 4 P. Furth: »Verweigerte Bürgerlichkeit«, S. 382 dieses Buches.«
S. 18
»
Der Trojanische Krieg war ein Völkermord, aber Homer ließ ihn als ein »Festspiel für die Götter« stattfinden. = The Trojan War was a genocide, but Homer let it take place as a »festival for the gods«.
«
WHICH MEANS THAT THE VANQUISHED ARE NOT ONLY VANQUISHED, BUT ESSENTIALLY IN EFFECT ALSO EFFACED AS LIVING PERSONAGES IN A COLLECTIVE FROM HISTORY, EVEN IF INDIVIDUALS, (PRIAM, HECUBA, HECTOR, PARIS, CASSANDRA, ANDROMACHE, AENEAS, MEMNON, TROILUS), STAND OUT AND ARE TREATED WITH UP TO ADMIRATION AND AFFECTION ...
S. 19-22
REFERENCES ARE MADE TO THAT (AS A SUBJECTIVE MATTER OF TASTE) ABSOLUTELY RIDICULOUS AND DISGUSTING, FILTHY VOMIT EXCREMENT JOO, ADORNO, WHO WAS P.F’s “TEACHER”, AND WHO OBVIOUSLY WROTE A LOT OF STUFF WHICH IS TRUE EMPIRICALLY, BUT ALSO WROTE A LOT OF RIDICULOUS ZIO-JOO-SHIT LIKE “NO-1 RITE DA POEM AFTA DA ZIO-KOST AND DA ZIO-KOST IS ABSOJOOLY IVIL”, AS IF E.G. A GREEK WHO LOST 1 MILLION GREEKS IN THE 20TH CENTURY TO UNJUST DEATH BY KILLING, DISEASE ETC., AND ANOTHER 2 MILLION TO MASS MIGRATION OUT OF GREECE, AND ON TOP OF THAT WITH TENS OF MILLIONS OF OUR ORTHODOX AND SOVIET AND OTHER WHITE CHRISTIAN BROTHERS AND SISTERS DEAD, NOT TO MENTION THE TENS OF MILLIONS OF AFRICANS, LATINOS AND ASIANS ET AL., WOULD GIVE A FUCK ABOUT DA ZIO-KOST.
I AM NOT A FUCKING SATANIST.
ANTI-SATANISM IS A PROBLEM FOR SATANISTS AND THEIR ALLIES.
I AM A HELLENE, SO I ONLY CARE ABOUT ANTI-HELLENISM AND MY DEAD.
BUT
WHAT IS EVEN MORE INSULTING IS THAT ANY JOO CAN EXAMINE HOW
MANY OF MY PEOPLE DIED IN THE 20TH CENTURY, BUT THE LAW PROHIBITS NON-JOOZ FROM EXAMINING HOW MANY JOOZ DIED IN DA ZIO-KOST EVEN THOUGH
JOORIC JOOBAWM IN HIS “AGE OF EXTREMES” SAID SOMETHING LIKE 5.1 OR 5.2 MILLIONZ
OR WHATEVER ... (NOT TO MENTION ALL THE SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY HATE TRIBE SATAN TENTS OF ZIO-KOST WORSHIP INCL. AS ENFORCED AND IMPOSED ON CHILDREN IN SKOOLZ, WITH GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATE ATTENTION THRU FILMS AND BOOKS PAID TO JOOZ, AND NOT TO HELLENES, SOVIETS, OTHER ORTHODOX, OTHER WHITE CHRISTIANS, ASIANS, AFRICANS, LATINOS ... IN ORGIES OF ZIO-JOO SUPREMACY, ZIO-JOO RACISM, ZIO-JOO BIGOTRY, ZIO-JOO PRIVILEGE AND ZIO-JOO CHAUVINISM ... )
WHAT IS THIS?
SOME KIND OF FUCKING ZIO-JOO DICTATORSHIP POSING AS “DEMOCRACY”?
DEATH TO THE SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY !!!
DEATH TO FUCKING SATAN !!!!!
ALSO, SOME OF THE IRONIES ARE EXPOSED, SUCH AS THE EMPHASIS ON THE “DESCENDANTS” AS BOTH PERPETRATORS AND VICTIMS OF THE ZIO-KOST, WHEN THE OFFICIAL SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY IDEOLOGY IS ONE OF “ANTI-RACISM” !!!
ANTI-SATANISM IS FOUGHT WITH A (NO LESS RACIST) PHILO-SATANISM.
S. 25
Günter Zehm: »Spaßgesellschaft und Schuldgemeinschaft« = “fun society and community of guilt”
[[IN OTHER WORDS, UNDER ZIO-USA VICTORIOUS IMPERIALISM, GERMANS COULD DO THE HEDONISMUS-KONZUM STUFF AS LONG AS THEY ALSO WORSHIPPED SATAN, SATANISTS AND SATANISM DURING THE COLD WAR]]
THE OTHER WELL-KNOWN ZEHM QUOTE, WHICH HAS OBVIOUSLY BEEN LEFT ON ZIO-JOOPEDIA TO TEMPT PEOPLE INTO ZIO-KOST DENIAL CONTRA LEGEM SO THAT THEY CAN BE PERSECUTED AND PROSECUTED SECUNDUM LEGEM (SINCE UNDER ZIO-USA OCCUPATION JOOS GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATELY THROUGH THEIR GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATE WEALTH AND PRIMITIVE SECRET SOCIETY NETWORKING GET TO DECIDE WHICH DEATHS AND KILLINGS ARE MORE IMPORTANT THAN OTHERS IN THE PUBLIC-PROPAGANDA-BRAIN WASHING REALM IN EXTREME ZIO-SUPREMACIST, ZIO-RACIST, ZIO-BIGGOTED, ZIO-CHAUVINISTIC MASTER RACE ZIO-HATE-TRIBE FASHION, INCL. THE ZIO-VILIFICATION OF CHRISTIANS AND WHITES AND THEIR TRADITIONS AND HISTORICAL IDENTITIES:
„Der Holocaust ist an die Stelle Gottes getreten. Über ‚das hohe C‘ im Namen von Parteien darf man spotten, aber an den Holocaust muß man glauben; wer Zweifel erkennen läßt, verschwindet hinter Gittern. Nicht viel anders steht es mit Multikulti. Das Vaterland, die Polis, darf nach Belieben verhöhnt werden; wer Multikulti ablehnt, wer Zuwanderung begrenzen oder Sozialhilfe für ‚Asylanten‘ kürzen will, der outet sich als ‚Rassist‘, und das ist fast so schlimm wie ‚Verharmloser des Holocaust‘.“ in Pankraz, Zivilreligionen und die Abschaffung der Politik. In: Junge Freiheit, 25. Februar 2000, S. 13. (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%BCnter_Zehm)
[[ALL THIS JUST REFLECTS THE CORRELATION OF FORCES AND THE BALANCE OF POWER RELATIONS. SINCE JOOS, GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATELY RUN ZIO-USA AND ITS DE FACTO (NOT DE JURE) COLONIES, WHICH ARE “FREE” BECAUSE THEY HAVE “FREE AND FAIR ELECTIONS” EVEN THOUGH THE ZIO-USA-JOO THROUGH SATAN EMBASSIES JUST ABOUT CONTROLS EVERYTHING, THEN OBVIOUSLY THERE IS GOING TO BE GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATE WORSHIP OF SATAN, SATANISM AND SATANISTS BY FULL-SPECTRUM ZIO-LOBOTOMISED ZOMBIE-ANIMALS (I AM THE FIRST ANIMAL AND APE). AND SINCE THE WEST IS ALREADY DEAD, IT’S UP TO RUSSIA AND CHINA AND OTHERS, IF THEY ARE GOOD ENOUGH, TO COLLECTIVELY SURVIVE, AND AS OF FEB. 2020, IT DOES NOT SEEM THAT CHINA IS DOING TOO WELL, NOTWITHSTANDING THE 70TH ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATIONS JUST A FEW MONTHS AGO !!!]]
S. 26 The pretence of morality not being morality, i.e. of being “objective”, but in fact it always is what it is: morality in relation to which there is always hypocrisy (since human behaviour can never fully conform all of the time with dominant morals given different interests, the friend-foe spectrum of the social relation etc.).
S. 27-28 And associated phenomena in our age occur such as “humanitarian radicalism” and the denunciation of the “foes and enemies of humanity”, [[CRAZY MAN ADDS:]] by absolutely disgusting and filthy VOMIT (WHO LOOK LIKE SATAN’S ARSEHOLE) people (grossly disproportionately, JOOZ and many other non-JOOZ) who e.g. are enriching themselves through the SUPER-EXPLOITATION of Third World cheap labour etc. !!!
S. 28 Christianity, more than any other religion, ties in with guilt as “extra-personal memory” which is combined with “personal memory” in ORGIES OF FULL-SPECTRUM ZIO-LOBOTOMISATION AND ZIO-KOST WORSHIP OF SATANISTS AND THE REPRESENTATIVES OF SATAN. I FOR EXAMPLE AM CRAZY AND A HELLENE GRECO-ROMAN, WHY WOULD I EVER GIVE A FUCK IF 6,000,000,000,000 ZIO-MAMMONIST-SATANISTS DIED? I’VE MET THOUSANDS OF THE REPRESENTATIVES OF SATAN (JOOZ AND ANGLO-JOOZ AND THEIR MANY ZIO-FULL-SPECTRUM LOBOTOMISED FRIENDS), AND NOT ONCE, HAS ANY ONE OF THESE DEVIL-EVIL-EVIL DEVIL SATANISTS EXPRESSED ANY INTEREST IN THE DEATHS OF ROMAN HELLEN GREEKS OR OTHER ORTHODOX PEOPLES !!!! EVERY TRIBE MOURNS FOR THEIR OWN. THAT’S THE WAY IT FUCKING WORKS, UNLESS SOME RETARD HAS BEEN FULL-SPECTRUM ZIO-SATAN-LOBOTOMISED!!! THE SATANISTS CAN STICK THEIR FUCKING ZIO-KOST UP THEIR FUCKING ZIO-ARSES (AND THAT DOES NOT AT ALL MEAN THAT I SUPPORT THE KILLING OF INNOCENT PEOPLE. ON THE CONTRARY, THAT SHOULD NEVER HAPPEN, EVEN THOUGH IT DOES, BUT DON’T YOU DARE, YOU VOMIT EXCREMENT ANIMALS, TELL ME WHOM TO MOURN FOR, YOU FUCKING DISGUSTING FILTHY ZIO-REPRESENTATIVES OF SATAN-MAMMON ANIMALS WITH YOUR FOUL-MAN NEARLY ALWAYS DRUNK TOTALLY FUCKED IN THE HEAD ANGLO-ZIO FRIENDS ET AL. !!!!).
S. 30 AND WHEN THE PAST IS LOOKED AT THAT WAY, I.E. GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATELY FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF ZIO-JOO EXCREMENT-VOMIT-ANIMAL MAMMON-SATANISTS, THEN YOUR OWN TRIBE HAS NO FUCKING FUTURE WHATSOEVER, BECAUSE YOU HAVE BEEN SATAN-ZIO-JOO-ED. OVER. DEAD. HAPPY SATAN-TSANOOKA!!!. ZIO.
(END OF INTRODUCTION).
»DAS
»ARBEITSKONZEPT<< IN DER MATERIALISTISCHEN ERKENNTNISTHEORIE« = "THE "CONCEPT OF LABOUR" IN THE MATERIALISTIC THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE"
S. 35-37
THERE ARE REFERENCES TO JOOS LIKE ERNST BLOCH AND GEORG LUKACS AS WELL AS DA ODER JOO (I PRESUME, I MIGHT BE WRONG AS I’M NOT 100% SURE), PETER RUBEN, ALL OF WHOM FELL FOUL OF THE EAST GERMAN AUTHORITIES (AT LEAST BERTOLT BRECHT, UNLESS I AM MISTAKEN, WASN’T A JOO, BECAUSE THE GROSS DISPROPORTIONATELY OF NUMBERS OF JOOZ IN “PHILOSOPHY” AND THE “ARTS” AND IN “PUBLIC LIFE” ETC. ETC. ETC. IS ABSOLUTELY FUCKING FILTHY, VOMIT-INDUCING AND DISGUSTING (WHETHER THE COUNTRY WAS/IS “CAPITALIST” OR “SOCIALIST”) IF ONE IS NOT A JOO OR A FULL-SPECTRUM ZIO-LOBOTOMISED FRIEND OF EXCREMENT FILTH JOOZ. (= SUBJECTIVE MATTER OF TASTE IN RELATION TO OBJECTIVE FACTS PERTAINING TO GROSS DISPROPORTIONATELY OF WEALTH AND FORMS OF POWER IN THE HANDS OF JOOZ FOR HISTORICAL-ORGANISATIONAL (PRIMITIVE SECRET SOCIETY) AND BIG MONEY-DAS KAPITAL RELATED REASONS, FUCKHEADS). NO POLITICAL PROGRAMME OF ANY KIND, HOWEVER, IS BEING SUGGESTED, FUCKHEADS.
NOW, PETER RUBEN IN THE DDR HAD TRIED TO MERGE COMMUNIST IDEOLOGY WITH SCIENTIFIC OBSERVATION – WHICH OF COURSE IS AN IMPOSSIBILITY, AND ONLY SOMETHING A SEMI-RETARDED JOO WOULD EVER TRY TO DO, OR OTHER RETARD, FULLY RETARDED OR OTHERWISE. RUBEN’S “PROBLEM” WAS THAT HIS TALK ABOUT HUMANS, SOCIALIST PRODUCTION ETC. DID NOT COMPLY WITH COMMUNIST ORTHODOXY. PARTY EXCLUSION HAPPENED IN MAY 1981. OF COURSE, MY DEAR INTERNET/TEXT AND LATE HUN-KRAUT-TEUTON-GOTH-BARBARIAN FRIEND PETER FURTH GOT INVOLVED AND WAS BANNED FROM VISITING THE DDR/GDR AGAIN UNTIL ITS END IN 1991 AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA-HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THERE’S ALSO A (POSITIVE, I THINK) REFERENCE TO P.K.’s PH.D CHIEF SUPERVISOR, WHOM P.K. WAS PISSED-OFF WITH, AND “THE NAZI” WERNER CONZE (WHO IS THE TEACHER OF HISTORICAL SCIENCE BAR NONE) INTERVENED TO ASSIST THE GREATEST PRACTITIONER OF THE SOCIAL, HISTORICAL AND POLITICAL SCIENCE(S) EVER, P.K..
S. 39-40
IN MARXIST THEORY (INCL. IN RELATION TO FEUERBACH), “PRAXIS” NEVER SAT COMFORTABLY (AS IN ALL “PHILOSOPHY”) WITH “THEORY”, AND EPISTEMOLOGY WAS SET ASIDE IN FAVOUR OF BIOLOGICAL-PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORIES OF THE GENESIS OF CONSCIOUSNESS AND IDEOLOGY. LENIN TALKED ABOUT “REFLECTION” AS A RELATIONSHIP OF PRODUCTION WITH CONSCIOUSNESS, AND THAT TIED IN WITH MARXIAN “DIALECTICAL MATERIALISM / SCIENTIFIC SOCIALISM”, AVOIDING THE “NARROWER” (OR BROADER, DEPENDING ON HOW ONE VIEWS IT!!!) CONNECTING OF “REFLECTION” TO THE SENSORIAL WORLD, MORE IN THE TRADITION OF EMPIRICISM (E.G. LOCKE).
S. 41-42
IN CONSIDERING THE UNITY OF SUBJECTIVE ACTIVITY AND OBJECTIVE CONDITIONS, THE CONCEPT OF REFLECTION IN MARXIAN THEORY LEADS TO AN EMANCIPATION OF THE WHOLE HUMAN SPECIES ONCE THE OBJECTIVE CONDITIONS ARE “ALTERED” IN SOCIALISM / COMMUNISM. [[ALL OF THIS IS, OF COURSE, TOTALY AND UTTER BULLSHIT, BECAUSE IT IMPLIES OVERCOMING THE SPECTRUM OF THE SOCIAL RELATION, CONFLICT, VIOLENCE, WAR ETC., WHICH IS AN ANTHROPOLOGICAL-SOCIAL ONTOLOGICAL IMPOSSIBILITY.]] THERE MUST ALWAYS BE KNOWLEDGE IN RESPECT OF HUMANS, OTHERWISE ANY KNOWLEDGE MUST ULTIMATELY BE EXPLAINED IN REGARD TO NON-EXISTENCE WHICH IS ABSURD (SINCE HUMANS COME WITH RATIONALITY-UNDERSTANDING-MEANING-THE PRODUCTION OF SYMBOLS ETC., WHICH DISTINGUISHES THEM FROM NON-HUMAN ANIMALS). FOR MARX, KNOWLEDGE THEN ARISES IN RELATION TO THE STAGE AND NATURE OF THE CURRENT PRODUCTION PROCESS [[THIS IS NOT ENTIRELY WRONG, THOUGH IT IS TOO NARROW, AS KNOWLEDGE CANNOT SIMPLY AND ONLY BE A REFLECTION OF WHETHER PREDOMINANT IS THE HUNTER-GATHER, THE PEASANT, THE PROLETARIAN, THE CONSUMER, ETC.. THERE ARE ALWAYS RESIDUES OF KNOWLEDGE FROM PREVIOUS KINDS OF SOCIAL FORMATIONS, AND FROM THE KNOWLEDGE RELATING FROM THINKING ITSELF UNCONNECTED TO MATERIAL PRODUCTION ETC., ETC., ETC..]]
S. 42-44
THERE IS DISCUSSION OF MARX’S NOTION OF SCIENCE AS “GENERAL WORK OR LABOUR / ALLGEMEINE ARBEIT”, INCL. “WORK/LABOUR” MORE SPECIFICALLY ... FOR MARX (IN REFERENCE TO THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE HUMAN MASTER BUILDER AND BEE / BAUMEISTER UND BIENE), THE DECISIVE FEATURE THAT DISTINGUISHES WORK/LABOUR FROM OTHER, ESPECIALLY ANIMAL, NATURAL PROCESSES, IS TOOL/INSTRUMENT/IMPLEMENT-MEDIATED PRODUCTION / DAS ENTSCHEIDENDE MERKMAL, DAS DIE ARBEIT VON ANDEREN, ZUMAL TIERISCHEN NATURPROZESSEN, UNTERSCHEIDET, IST DIE WERKZEUGVERMITTELTE PRODUKTION ... THIS RELATES TO SEMI-SUPA JOO AND SUPA JOO SMART ARSE LUKÁCS AND “WORK [[AS]] THE REALISATION OF A TELEOLOGICAL SETTING-POSITING” / DIE »ARBEIT DIE VERWIRKLICHUNG EINER TELEOLOGISCHEN SETZUNG« SEI ... AND WE ARE INFORMED BY MY GOOD AND LATE INTERNET FRIEND PETER FURTH (WHO WAS A TRUE, REAL, ACTUAL PROFESSOR AND NOT A ZIO-JOO-ANGLO-GALLO-FROG-JOO RETARD-IDEOLOGUE) THAT THE SUBJECT-OBJECT SCHEMA CANNOT CONTAIN WITHIN IT THE MARXIAN NOTION OF WORK DISCUSSED HERE [[BECAUSE MARX, RIGHTLY, WAS POINTING TO THE SOCIAL RELATION AND THE PRIMACY OR PRE-EXISTENCE OF SOCIETY]]
[[AS WE CAN SEE, MARX GOT ALL OF THIS ABOUT WORK/LABOUR ABOUT HALF-RIGHT, AND FUDGED IT WITH HIS JUDEO-CHRISTIAN MESSIANISM ...
THE SOCIAL-ONTOLOGICAL REALLY AND ACTUALLY AND TRULY SCIENTIFIC POSITION IS THAT HUMANS ARE DISTINGUISHED FROM NON-HUMAN ANIMALS BECAUSE HUMANS CREATE, PRODUCE, MAKE ... BOTH SYMBOLS AND TOOLS ETC. (TO AN EXTENT THAT NO NON-HUMAN ANIMAL CAN, EVEN IF SOME SUPA BRAINY ANIMALS CAN DO IT A BIT ETC.), AND DO NOT JUST USE WHAT IS AVAILABE IN NATURE AS IS, LIKE MOST (IF NOT ALL) NON-HUMAN ANIMALS ... (JUST TO CLARIFY, JOOZ ARE HUMANS, AND NOT NON-HUMAN ANIMALS, EVEN THOUGH THEY HAVE ACCUMULATED GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATE WEALTH AND FORMS OF POWER FOR OBVIOUS HISTORICAL MAMMON-MONEY-SATANIC-JUDAS-ETC. AND PRIMITIVE SECRET SOCIETY (DEEP STATE I SPY WITH MY LITTLE BEADY ZIO-JOO EYE-TAX-CRIME-MASS MEDIA-UNIZ-SKOOLZ-BRAIN WASHING-ZIO-KOST-WORSHIP-CO-ZIO-EXIST-LOBOTOMISING-BANKS-FUNDS-TRUSTS-CORPORATIONS-LOBBY-RULE OF LAW SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY-JOO-ZIO-BOOKS-JOOGLEZ-ZIO-TUBEZ ETC. ETC. ETC.) ORGANISATIONAL REASONS IN PARTICULAR CAPITALISTIC-IMPERIALISTIC COUNTRIES OF THE (FORMER) WEST ... )) ...]]
S. 44-46: THERE IS NO ARGUMENT BY CRAZY MAN THAT LABOUR / WORK IS SOCIAL ACTIVITY IN RELATION TO SOCIETY SINCE IT GOES TOWARDS PRODUCING SOMETHING WHICH CAN AT LEAST POTENTIALLY BE EXCHANGED. THE QUESTION OF WHAT KIND OF, AND HOW MUCH, PROPERTY OWNERSHIP THERE SHOULD BE IN WHOSE HANDS ETC., IS ALSO SOCIETY-POWER-RELATED, AND ITS ALTERATION AND OR MAINTENANCE IS A MATTER OF THE POLITICAL CORRELATION OF FORCES. (ALIENATION, TO THE EXTENT IT EXISTS, IS A MATTER OF MASSIFICATION-ATOMISATION-MOBILITY IN RESPECT OF TRADITIONAL COMMUNITIES AND TRADITIONAL PATRIARCHAL FAMILIAL STRUCTURES, BUT EVEN IN THOSE PRE-MASS SOCIETY FORMS OF SOCIAL ORGANISATION, AN INDIVIDUAL COULD FEEL “ALIENATED” AND NOT BE “PROPERLY SOCIALISED” AS A “MISFIT” OR “OUTCAST” ... THE MOTIF OF “ALIENTATION” IS ONE OF THE SEVERAL REALLY, TRULY SOCIETAS CIVILIS CONSERVATIVE MOTIFS WHICH MARX AND MARXISTS “STOLE” TO INCORPORATE IN THE MARXIST VIEW OF CAPITALISM-SOCIALISM ...).
S. 46-49: TWO DEFINITIONS OF REAL WORK / WIRKLICHEN ARBEIT - THE PECULIARITY OF THE STATUS OF THE MEANS OF LABOUR OR EQUIPMENT FOR WORK / ARBEITSMITTELS, AND, THE COLLECTIVE FORM OF THE SUBJECT OF WORK-LABOUR / DIE KOLLEKTIVE FORM DES SUBJEKTS DER ARBEIT - ARE NOT ONLY IMPORTANT FOR A CORRECT UNDERSTANDING OF THE MARXIAN CONCEPT OF WORK-LABOUR, BUT THEY ALSO GIVE A DIRECT ACCESS TO THE UNDERSTANDING OF THE CONCEPT OF SCIENCE AS "GENERAL WORK" / SIE GEBEN AUCH EINEN DIREKTEN ZUGANG ZUM VERSTÄNDNIS DES BEGRIFFS DER WISSENSCHAFT ALS «ALLGEMEINER ARBEIT». COLLECTIVE PROPERTY AS A CONDITION OF CONCRETE LABOR. UNDER THE CONDITION OF SOCIALITY, THE PRODUCTION PROCESS IS ASSUMED AS A STRUCTURED TOTALITY, AS A CONNECTION BETWEEN DIFFERENT TYPES OF WORK / DAS KOLLEKTIVE EIGENTUM ALS BEDINGUNG DER KONKRETEN ARBEIT. UNTER DER BEDINGUNG DER GESELLSCHAFTLICHKEIT IST DER PRODUKTIONSPROZEß ALS EINE GEGLIEDERTE TOTALITÄT. AS KINDS OR USE VALUE, OPPOSED ARE: ON THE ONE HAND, IN THE CASE OF THE USE VALUE, THE ABOLITION (CONSUMPTION) OF THE ACTIVITY [[OF LABOUR]] OBJECTIFIED-REIFIED IN THE PRODUCT (SUBSUMPTION OF THE OBJECT UNDER I.E. IN OR DURING THE ACTIVITY), AND ON THE OTHER HAND, IN THE CASE OF THE MODEL, THE PRESERVATION OF THE OBJECTIFIED-REIFIED ACTIVITY (SUBSUMPTION OF THE ACTIVITY UNDER THE THING) / ALS GEBRAUCHSARTEN STEHEN SICH GEGENÜBER: EINERSEITS, IM FALL DES GEBRAUCHSWERTS, DIE AUFHEBUNG (VERBRAUCH) DER IM PRODUKT VERGEGENSTÄNDLICHTEN TÄTIGKEIT (SUBSUMTION DER SACHE UNTER DIE TÄTIGKEIT) UND ANDERERSEITS, IM FALL DES MODELLS, DIE ERHALTUNG DER VERGEGENSTÄNDLICHTEN TÄTIGKEIT (SUBSUMTION DER TÄTIGKEIT UNTER DIE SACHE) SO THAT THERE CAN BE A CONTINUATION-REPRODUCTION OF THE PRODUCTION PROCESS, ETC.. AND THIS LEADS TO A DISCUSSION OF GEBRAUCHSWERTE / USE VALUES, AND NATURE, AND LABOUR’S, AND THE MEANS OF LABOUR’S AND THE USE VALUES’ ETC. MEDIATING FUNCTION / VERMITTLUNGSFUNKTION. [[ALL OF THIS IS PRETTY MUCH CORRECT SINCE WORK IS “LOST” OR “DISAPPEARS” IN THE PRODUCTS PRODUCED, WHICH ARE THEN EXCHANGED FOR MONEY AND CONSUMED ETC., BUT IT MEANS NOTHING IN TERMS OF GIVING AS A “PROGRESSIVE VIEW OF HISTORY” “PROGRESSING” TOWARDS UTOPIA, ETC.. AND THAT’S BECAUSE THE OVERLY ECONOMISTIC VIEW OF THINGS, IS NOT PROPERLY WEIGHED AGAINST POLITICAL-IDEOLOGICAL RELATIONS OF POWER, AND IT IS PRESUMED THAT “SOCIALISM” WILL “JUST HAPPEN” – SOMETHING THE BRUTAL POLITICAL REALISTS, LENIN, STALIN, MAO ET AL., KNEW OR FOUND OUT NEVER “JUST HAPPENS” ... ]].
S. 49-51
REFERENCES TO USE VALUE (GEBRAUCHSWERT) AS NATURAL FORCES CONVERTED INTO AGENTS OF LABOUR-WORK (DIE VERTRETER IN AGENTEN DER ARBEIT VERWANDELTE NATURKRÄFTE), MODELS (MODELLE), THE MODEL AS ABSTRACT GENERAL (DAS MODELL VERTRITT ALSO EIN ABSTRACT ALLGEMEINES), MEANS OF LABOUR-WORK (ARBEITSMITTEL) (AS USE VALUE), FACTS OF NATURE (SACHVERHALTE DER NATUR), REPRESENTATIVE OF THE GENERAL (VERTRETER VON ALLGEMEIN), TOOL-INSTRUMENT-IMPLEMENT (WERKZEUG), DIALECTICAL CONTRADICTION (DIALEKTISCHEN WIDERSPRUCHS) ... NATURAL OBJECTS AND MUTUAL INFLUENCE/INTERACTION (WECHSELWIRKUNG), WITH THE CONTRADICTION NOT BRINGING CHANGE, AS IDENTITY REMAINS ... ORIGINAL AND COPY MIRROR EACH OTHER ... AND “REFLECTION RELATION / WIDERSPIEGELUNGSBEZIEHUNG”. ALL OF THIS IS A FAIRLY ROUND-ABOUT WAY OF EXPLAINING IN MARXIST TERMS HOW CAPITALISM REPRODUCES ITSELF ON A MASTER-SERVANT / CAPITALIST-PROLETARIAN BASIS BOTH AS PRACTICE (IN ACTUAL PHYSICAL LABOUR AND THE POSSESSION OF CAPITAL) AND FALSE CONSCIOUSNESS / IDEOLOGY, WHEREBY “EVERYONE” JUST ACCEPTS THINGS THE WAY THEY ARE ... OF COURSE, IT ALL PRESUMES THAT “COMMUNISM IS COMING” SO THAT WHATEVER IS CORRECT IN ITS REFERENCES TO NATURE AND LABOUR/WORK AND CAPITAL AND EXPLOITATION ETC., IS ALSO OBFUSCATED BY MARXISM’S OWN IDEOLOGY OF SOCIALISM-COMMUNISM “COMING TO SOLVE EVERYTHING” ... IN ANY EVENT, IT IS OBVIOUS FROM THIS ACTUALLY REAL MARXIAN THEORISATION, THAT “CULTURAL MARXISM” HAS NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH MARXISM, BUT IS A MATTER OF PRESENT-DAY LEFT/RIGHT POLEMICS IN THE ABSENCE OF AN UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT (WESTERN) MASS DEMOCRACY IS AND WHAT IT HAS LED TO, AND TO WHAT IT IS LEADING TOO = GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATELY ZIO-JOO-SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY ZIO-KOST WORSHIP-LOBOTOMISATION-OTHERISATION OF THE ZIO-JOO ANGLO-GALLO-GERMANO-ZIO-JOO ANTI-CHRIST AND THE AUTO-PHOBIC, SELF-HATING, SELF-RACIST AUTO-GENOCIDE OF THE HISTORICAL WHITE CHRISTIAN PEOPLES OF EUROPE AND THE ASSOCIATED WITH IMPERIALIST ZIO-CAPITALIST-JUDEO-ZIO-“CHRISTIAN” GREAT BRITAIN FORMER WHITE SETTLER COLONIES ...
S. 51-55
IT’S NOT WRONG TO SAY THAT HUMANS AND GROUPS OF HUMANS THINK IN TERMS OF ABSTRACATIONS-CONCEPTUALISATIONS, AND THAT OBJECTIVE REALITY IS A WHOLE WHICH CANNOT BE UNDERSTOOD AS A WHOLE BY HUMANS – TO THE EXTENT IT CAN BE UNDERSTOOD – BUT (IN PART) THROUGH ABSTRACTIONS-CONCEPTULISATIONS. THE MARXIST JARGON / WAY OF PUTTING THINGS (RE: RELATIONS AND CIRCUMSTANCES AND CONDITIONS OF REFLECTION (WIDERSPIEGELUNGSVERHÄLTNISSEN), MODELS (MODELLE), GENERAL WORK (ALLGEMEINEN ARBEIT), On the other hand, it is correct to view the abstract as a reduced reality / Richtig ist dagegen, das Abstrakte als reduzierte Realität aufzufassen. ... ETC., ETC. ETC..) IN THE ARTICLE, THEREFORE, GETS US A LOT OF THE WAY TO ABSOLUTELY CONSISTENT SCIENTIFIC OBSERVATION, BUT DEFINITELY NOT ALL OF THE WAY. WHAT THE MARXIST VIEWPOINT GETS WRONG IS THAT IT DOES NOT APPLY THE CORRECT MARXIST NOTION OF FALSE CONSCIOUSNESS AND IDEOLOGY TO ITSELF (MANNHEIM), AND THUS BLURS IS WITH OUGHT, AS ALL NON-SCIENTIFIC NORMATIVISTIC THOUGHT ALWAYS DOES. THERE IS NO “Tätigkeit der Aneignung / Activity of appropriation” WHICH SOCIETY CAN OVERCOME TO CREATE A UTOPIA. ALL SOCIETIES WILL HAVE ELEMENTS OF HIERARCHY AND ELEMENTS OF EQUALITY TO GREATLY VARYING DEGREES AND IN GREATLY VARYING DOSES, INCL. AS TO THE DISTRIBUTION OF GOODS AND FORMS OF POWER. THERE IS NO UTOPIA BUT IN THE HEADS OF DREAMERS AND OR THOSE WHO LIKE RABID ANIMALS, E.G. JOOZ AND ALLIES OF JOOZ, WHO WANT TO CONTROL EVERYONE AND EVERYTHING, I.E. THE WHOLE WORLD, RATHER THAN JUST THEIR OWN TRIBE. (THIS ARTICLE WAS OK, BUT IT IS TOO MARXIST-DOGMATIC-IDEOLOGICAL TO HAVE ANYTHING MORE THAN HISTORICAL INTERERST. NEVERTHELESS, PETER FURTH SHOW SIGNS THAT HE WILL BE ABLE TO OUTGROW IDEOLOGICAL THINKING, WHICH HE DID, INCL. THROUGH HIS ENCOUNTERS WITH THE GREATEST OVERALL ALL-TIME THINKER IN THE HUMAN-SOCIAL SCIENCES, P.K.).
»BEMERKUNGEN ZUR GEGENWÄRTIGEN LAGE DES FRIEDENS = REMARKS / OBSERVATIONS / COMMENTS ON THE PRESENT-DAY SITUATION OF PEACE«
S. 57-62
CRAZY MAN NOT SURE IF GOOD OLE PETE IS BEING 100% CLEAR HERE. WAR IS STILL POSSIBLE WITHOUT COMPLETE ANNIHILATION OF ALL SIDES IN THE ATOMIC/NUCLEAR AGE IF THE SIDES INVOLVED “AGREE” TO WAGE WAR THROUGH PROXIES OR EVEN BETWEEN THEMSELVES ON A NON-NUCLEAR, NON-ATOMIC BASIS. THE FUNDAMENTAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN POLITICS AND WAR (WAR IS A CONTINUATION OF POLITICS (MEANT SOCIALLY-POLITICALLY AND “OBJECTIVELY”, AND NOT “SUBJECTIVELY” ON A NARROW PARTY-POLITICAL BASIS) BY OTHER MEANS) DOES NOT CHANGE IN THE NUCLEAR / ATOMIC AGE. THERE IS SUCH A THING AS (RELATIVELY SLOW) CHEMICAL OR BIOLOGICAL WARFARE. WAR BY DEFINITION IS THE USE OF FORCE AND VIOLENCE BY OPPOSED ORGANISED GROUPS-COLLECTIVES CAUSING DEATH FOR PARTISAN / POLITICAL / GROUP-COLLECTIVE ENDS. TERRORISM CAN BE DEFINED AS UNCONVENTIONAL NON-STATE WAR BASED ON SURPRISE, WHEREAS SURPRISE BETWEEN STATES IS POSSIBLE, BUT NOT THE NORM. CRAZY MAN IS SURE THERE ARE OTHER WAYS, PHRASES ETC. TO DEFINE WAR AND TERRORISM.
S. 62-65
»Die Wirklichkeit des Abschreckungsfriedens ist der Rüstungskrieg« = The reality of the/a peace in respect of deterrence is the/an armaments war (i.e. armaments race). WHAT THIS MEANS IS THAT EVEN IF ARMS CONTROL AGREEMENTS ARE IN PLACE, THEY CAN BE CANCELED, AS RECENTLY SEEN, AND THE STRUGGLE FOR SUPERIORITY / ESCALATION OVER-IN RESPECT OF THE OTHER SIDE / OTHER SIDES BECOMES COMPELLING AGAIN.
S. 66-68
ESCALATION / DIE ESKALATION, THEREFORE, IS SOMETHING WHICH THE MORE DARING [[AND OR CRAZY]] SIDE CAN PUSH AND PUSH FOR, IN IT’S “RISK-TAKING”, UNTIL EITHER THERE IS A GRAND KA-BOOM, OR THE OTHER SIDE BACKS DOWN, UNABLE AND OR UNWILLING TO RECIPROCALLY ESCALATE IN ITS OWN THREAT TO ITS OPPONENT / ENEMY. AND THE NOTION OF THE “FIRST STRIKE” »ERSTSCHLAG« IS ONE WHICH ENTAILS THE PARALYSING OF THE OTHER SIDE AND VICTORY FOR THE SIDE WITH THE CAPACITY AND WILL TO CARRY OUT A SUCCESSFUL “FIRST STRIKE” / PRE-EMPTIVE STRIKE. ALSO, THE NOTION OF “COUNTERFORCE” = THE PREVENTIVE DESTRUCTION OF THE ENEMY'S DEFENSIVE CAPABILITIES (der präventiven Zerstörung der gegnerischen Verteidigungsfähigkeit).
»Clausewitz' Bestimmung des wesensmäßigen Kriegsziels, Wehrlosmachung des Gegners, scheint wieder möglich, der Krieg scheint wieder eingesetzt in sein altes Recht, die Fortsetzung der Politik mit anderen Mitteln zu sein. In den Termini der Abschreckungsdoktrin gesagt: Die Strategie der gegenseitigen Vergeltung hat sich in die Strategie der einseitig vorbeugenden Gegenvergeltung verwandelt.« = Clausewitz's definition of the essential aim of war, the defenselessness of the opponent / foe / enemy, seems possible again; war seems to be reinstated in its old right to continue politics by other means. Put in terms of the doctrine of deterrence: The strategy of mutual / reciprocal retaliation has been converted / transformed and turned into the strategy of unilateral or one-sided preventive counter-retaliation.